Е-300 в почти полном боевом оперении,не хватает нескольких мелочей,а именно:7-14мм, 35-100мм, 90-250мм и,пожалуй,300мм.Ну,а если серьёзно,прислали,наконец,VA-1.При ручной фокусировке очень помогает, особенно тем у кого со зрением не ладно.
Вот нечего было делать, поковырялся в меню, подскажите кто знает: меню камера со значком "2" 13 пункт сверху в низ русский "Компенсация затенения" english "shading comp." варианты ON, Off EDITED: прошивка body 1.4 мануал молчит
s_z Кстати, хороший вопрос. В версии 1.4 появились новые пункты в меню. Естественно, в документации их нет. Для таких случаев берем мануал на E-500 :D! И читаем там следующее: Коррекция тени В ряде случаев края изображения могут быть затенены вследствие характеристик объектива. Функция коррекции тени компенсирует данный недостаток, увеличивая яркость темного края изображения. Эта функция особенно полезна при использовании широкоугольного объектива. 1 Menu[ ]>[SHADING COMP.] 2 Используйте для выбора [OFF] или [ON]. 3 Нажмите кнопку OK. Примечания • Эта функция не работает при установке на фотоаппарат преобразователя телеобъектива или внутреннего удлинительного тубуса. • При повышенных настройках ISO могут стать заметны искажения по краям снимка.
Серёжище после того как был сделан кадр, на програмном уровне начинается обработка крев снимка, устранение виньетки, это увеличивает время перерыва между двумя кадрами. Собственно это можно на порядок лучшесделать с помощью любого ПО на компе и не заморачиваться, да и ограничений нет :rolleyes: .
Хе, хе.Благодаря энтой функции мне удалось купить Е1 по бросовой цене, хозяин камеры обносил его к куче разных "спецов", "спецы" сказали- "Выкинь камеру ибо она так работает".
Неоднозначно. Если снимаете в RAW - то да, наверное. А если снимать в JPEG - то это еще вопрос. Подозреваю, что внутрикамерная обработка будет-таки использовать сырые данные, и вытягивать тени в углах чисто. Чего не получится сделать, работая "с помощью любого ПО на компе".
Я хотел бы предупредить пользователей е-300 о вероятности поломки USB разъема в камере. На днях втыкал кабель и чтото хрустнуло :blink:, смотрю а разъем на камере того :ohmy: как срезало по наклонной :(. Не так это прискорбно, но как факт. Не повторяйте моих ошибок товарищи будте нежнее :rusruletka:
был очень впечатлен фотографиями на Е-300 http://www.photosight.ru/ownpage.php?authorid=56581 еще одно доказательсво того что все дело в ручках...
На форуме запрещено: "VI.1.2.6. рекламировать товары и услуги, без разрешения администрации форума" Не камера длает снимки :rolleyes:
Дядька сравнивает Е300 и К10 As some of you may know I had become somewhat disenchanted with some aspects of my E-300. I finally made a move to a different system. The Pentax K10. As soon as it was announced I thought "this is the camera for me". So I pre-ordered one and the Pentax 77mm limited lens to get the rebate (little did I know that the rebate would be extended :-( ). So when the cameras start shipping I ordered another lens (Sigma 24-70/2.8) and the Pentax 540 flash, monopod, head, bag which those 3 things I've wanted for a while. So to get on with the "story". Camera comes in. Build is very nice. Very well balanced even with the big Sigma on it. Excellent ergos. Sv and TaV and customizable auto ISO are great. More comfortable than the E-300 and physically almost identicle in size although heavier. VF was really nice. But in switching back and forth I really didn't seem to mind the E-300 VF. It's just something I don't notice unless I'm trying to compare the VFs. I don't think the VF is quite as bright as the D200 though. Camera was in most aspects noticably faster than the E-300. AF with the Sigma was truely exceptional. As fast as anything I've used in fair to good light. Continuous shooting seemed much faster than the 2.5 to 3fps would seem. Image quality in good light at all ISOs was very good, as was saturation and sharpness. In low light though I'd only give it at most a 1 stopand half over the E-300 and certainly not any better than what I've seen from the E-400. Although I can't say for sure since I wasn't able of course to shoot them in the same conditions. But the high ISO noise did clean up well in noiseware and I was able to make a nice 8x10 of a ISO 1600 shot in nasty lighting. The SR seemed to work pretty well. I was able to get a sharp shot at 77mm (115 effective) at F1.8 1/30 SS in a moving van over a rough road. One thing about the SR though is it took about a 1/2 -1 second to "settle in". There is a little hand with the (( )) around it to tell you when the SR is working. This took about the time above to become visible in the VF. So a really quick shot would probably occur before the SR was active. This would not be a problem in most cases since slow SS shots are seldom done in a rush. Now to the part where I return to the Oly camp. The first body I had FFed almost 1 foot at about 15 feet with both lenses. In this case the Sigma was better though. I sent it back. The 2nd body was much better and shots taken at 5 feet or so and less were very sharp with the 77 and a just a little less so with the Sigma. But beyond that 5 or 6 foot range both lenses still FFed. The Sigma was the worst and did it consitantly. The 77 was a little better but still OOF and soft. Out of over a 150 shots testing this and that I had only one that I would accept in sharpness (these were done at distances of more than 15 feet) and this one I had to stop down to F8. One thing I discoverd in this testing is that I have a slight BF with my 50 macro- So after the holidays I'm going to send my E-300 in to Oly for cleaning and adjustment. So the focus was the biggest bugaboo and rendered the camera useless to me. Other issues- AWB was not any better- maybe more consistant but not better. It under exposed almost all the time. +.7 was normal. Not really any difference between matrix and CW. Default color and saturation is more accurate than Oly but I like the Oly oversaturated look. The jpegs were compressed down to between 1.5-3mb. Even though I could see no difference when compared to SHQs from the E-300, it bothered me that they were compressed so heavily as I prefer to shoot jpeg. I though I'd never say this- but the E-300 focused faster in low light both with and without the external flash's AF IR assist on both cameras. The K10 had a habit of getting "close" to focus as fast but then the lens/AF would thunk, thunk, thunk as it tried to lock focus. It did this even with the flash IR beam. Annoying. I'm sure they're other things I'm missing, but given the age and price of the Oly the K10 even when it did focus was not that much better. To be honest the K10 images that were in focus were better though and seemed to have IMO a noticable resolution advantage especially at the higher ISOs. So, my K10 experiment is over, I still have to sell the 77 most likely at a loss. I'm out shipping and time of course. But I had to try- if not I'd always be wondering. I thought about a 30D or D200 or my original plans of a D2HS, but in the end I'm going to likely get a 50-200 and maybe the 14-54 and the VG (as much as I think it's about $50 overpriced) after my camera comes back from service.
УРА!!! сделали мой Е-300... остался очень доволен московским сервис центром Олимпус ...починили все по гарантии... даже матовое стеклышко в видоискателе поменяли (я часто менял оптику и оно было в пылинках )....
Плохо понимаю по японски, но кажись у нового 40-150 проблемы совместимости с E-300 http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/dslr/200...12/14/5250.html
Эти проблемы весьма вероятны, если прошивка Е-300 слегка устаревшая. лимпус честно предупреждал, что грядёт модернизация протокола. Так что, новейшие стёкла не обязаны работать с Е-300 у всех тех, кто поленился (или забыл) залить последнюю прошивку.